Everything about Capital Punishment In India totally explained
Capital punishment is legal in
India although rarely used. Between
1975 and
1991, about 40 people were executed, though there was a period between 1995 and
2004 when there were no executions. Therefore India has the lowest execution rate amongst retentionist countries.
In
August 2004, a 41-year-old former security man,
Dhananjoy Chatterjee, was executed for raping and killing a 14-year-old schoolgirl in
Calcutta. This was the country's first execution since 1995 and the first execution in
West Bengal since 1993 when Kartik Sil and Sukumar Burman were hanged.
The death penalty is to be used in the "rarest of rare" cases according to a finding of the
Supreme Court of India, although the meaning of this phrase isn't clearly defined. Capital punishment can be imposed for
murder, instigating a child's
suicide,
treason, acts of
terrorism, or a second conviction for
drug trafficking. A judge can refuse to award the death sentence even in "rarest of the rare" cases by providing reasons for doing so.
About 40 mercy petitions are pending before the president, some of them from 1992. At least 3 are women. Many more are on death row after having been sentenced to die by lower courts, but on appeal most of them are likely to be commuted to life imprisonment by the State High Courts or the Supreme Court of India.
It appears that judges in the lower courts are also getting increasingly averse to use the capital punishment. For example in 2007 several high profile cases involving pre-meditated cold blooded murders, rape and murder of minors during rioting, terrorist bombings, etc. have not attracted the death penalty. But activists reveal a flaw, that due to the absence of sentencing guidelines in what constitutes "rarest of the rare", in some less gruesome murders, the lower courts have awarded death sentences possibly due to poor defence presented by the lawyers of the economically backward.
The death penalty is carried out by
hanging. After a 1983 challenge to this method, the Supreme Court ruled that hanging didn't involve torture, barbarity, humiliation or degradation.
A major controversy exists as to whether or not to execute
Mohammad Afzal, an alleged Kashmiri terrorist who was convicted of masterminding the attack on the Indian parliament building. His death sentence was upheld by the Indian Supreme Court in 2006 on the grounds that the attack "shocked the conscience of the society at large". But the central government has so far not disposed of his mercy petition providing an emotive issue to the opposition parties.
According to the government, a total of 55 people (all men) have been executed in India since independence in 1947. Activists are seeking to use the Right to Information Act to get an exact figure but some government officials have admitted that they don't have exact records.
Further Information
Get more info on 'Capital Punishment In India'.
|
External Link Exchanges
Do you know how hard it is to get a link from a large encyclopaedia? Well we're different and will prove it. To get a link from us just add the following HTML to your site on a relevant page:
<a href="http://capital_punishment_in_india.totallyexplained.com">Capital punishment in India Totally Explained</a>
Then simply click through this link from your web page. Our crawlers will verify your link, extract the title of your web page and instantly add a link back to it. If you like you can remove the words Totally Explained and embed the link in article text.
As long as your link remains in place, we'll keep our link to you right here. Please play fair - our crawlers are watching. Your site must be closely related to this one's topic. Any kind of spamming, dubious practises or removing the link will result in your link from us being dropped and, potentially, your whole site being banned. |
